Data Intelligence

Takeaway Food Hygiene Ratings UK: What Our Analysis of 62,979 Takeaways Reveals

8 min read

We analysed 62,979 UK takeaways in our FHRS database. Only 50.5% score a 5. Here is what the data shows about chains, local authorities, and the 1,451 takeaways rated 0 or 1.

TLDR

  • Only 50.5% of UK takeaways are rated 5. The national average across all food businesses is 62.3%.
  • 1,451 takeaways (2.3%) hold a rating of 0 or 1, meaning urgent or major improvement is needed.
  • Takeaways are nearly twice as likely as restaurants to score below 3 on food hygiene inspections.
  • Birmingham has the most takeaways rated 0 or 1 (77 establishments). Hillingdon has the highest rate at 10.6%.
  • Domino's Pizza scores 99% rated 5 across 1,118 locations. Dixy Chicken scores just 49.5% across 91 locations.
  • Check any takeaway's rating on our chain rankings or area guide pages.

We track food hygiene ratings for 602,795 UK food establishments. That includes 62,979 takeaways and sandwich shops. When you break the numbers down, the picture is not what most people expect.

Only half of UK takeaways hold the top rating of 5. Nearly 1 in 20 are rated below 3, meaning inspectors found significant problems. Some local authority areas have more than 10% of their takeaways rated 0 or 1. And the gap between the best and worst national chains is enormous.

In this guide

  1. The overall picture: how UK takeaways score
  2. Takeaways vs restaurants: who scores worse?
  3. Which areas have the worst-rated takeaways?
  4. How the big takeaway chains compare
  5. What a rating of 0 actually means for a takeaway
  6. The independent takeaway problem
  7. How we compiled this data

The overall picture: how UK takeaways score

Our database contains 62,979 establishments classified as 'Takeaway/sandwich shop' by the Food Standards Agency. Each one has been inspected and rated on a scale from 0 (urgent improvement necessary) to 5 (very good).

Here is the full breakdown:

RatingTakeaways% of all takeawaysWhat it means
531,79550.5%Very good
410,43816.6%Good
37,01211.1%Generally satisfactory
21,5622.5%Improvement necessary
11,2712.0%Major improvement necessary
01800.3%Urgent improvement necessary

The remaining 10,721 takeaways (17.0%) are either awaiting inspection, exempt, or operating under the Scottish system which uses Pass/Improvement Required instead of numeric ratings.

The headline number: only half of UK takeaways earn a top rating. Compare that to 62.3% across all 603,266 food businesses in our database. Takeaways consistently underperform the national average.

Takeaways vs restaurants: who scores worse?

We compared the 62,979 takeaways against the 139,005 restaurants, cafes, and canteens in our database. The gap is clear.

63.6% of restaurants are rated 5. Only 50.5% of takeaways hit the same mark. That is a 13 percentage point gap.

At the bottom end, 4.8% of takeaways score below 3 (rated 0, 1, or 2). For restaurants, that figure is 2.9%. Takeaways are nearly twice as likely to have significant hygiene problems flagged by inspectors.

Why the difference? Takeaway kitchens tend to be smaller. Staff turnover is higher. Many operate as single-owner businesses without dedicated food safety managers. EHO inspectors assess the same three criteria for both, but the 'confidence in management' score often drags takeaway ratings down. When the owner is also the cook, the cleaner, and the bookkeeper, documentation gets deprioritised.

That does not mean all takeaways score poorly. Over 42,000 takeaways hold a rating of 4 or 5. But the tail end of poor performers is longer and heavier than it is for sit-down restaurants.

Which areas have the worst-rated takeaways?

We ranked every local authority area by the percentage of takeaways rated 0 or 1. The results show significant regional variation.

Local AuthorityTakeaways rated 0 or 1Total takeaways% rated 0 or 1
Hillingdon3028310.6%
Waltham Forest252699.3%
Birmingham771,0587.3%
Bolton243536.8%
Redbridge183305.5%

Birmingham tops the raw count with 77 takeaways rated 0 or 1. But Hillingdon in west London has the highest rate: more than 1 in 10 of its takeaways hold the two lowest possible ratings.

Three of the top five worst areas are London boroughs. Waltham Forest and Redbridge both appear in the list. This aligns with the density of takeaway businesses in London and the inspection backlogs some boroughs experienced after COVID.

The local-authority picture gets even sharper when you zoom into postcode districts rather than council boundaries. Our analysis of the 15 UK postcodes with the weakest average hygiene ratings shows how clusters in East London and Birmingham sit inside those broader borough-level trends.

You can check how your local area compares on our area guide pages. Every postcode district has its own breakdown of ratings by business type.

How the big takeaway chains compare

National chains have standardised food safety systems, centralised training, and dedicated compliance teams. Does that show up in the ratings? Mostly yes, but with some notable exceptions. Our coffee chain rankings show the same pattern outside takeaway-heavy brands: Starbucks and Pret cluster near the top, while Caffe Nero leaves a much longer tail of 4s and 3s.

ChainLocations% rated 5Average rating
Domino's Pizza1,11899%5.0
Nando's37999%5.0
Wagamama13999%5.0
Greggs1,50397%5.0
McDonald's88597%5.0
KFC66394%4.9
Pret A Manger39494%4.9
Pepe's Piri Piri16589%4.9
Subway1,51185%4.8
Morley's Fried Chicken4663%4.5
Dixy Chicken9149.5%3.9

Domino's Pizza stands out. Across 1,118 UK locations, 99% hold a top rating of 5. Only 1% scored below that. Their centralised food safety system and temperature monitoring protocols clearly work at scale.

At the other end, Dixy Chicken has the lowest average rating of any chain with 50+ locations in our database. Fewer than half its 91 outlets score a 5. Fifteen percent are rated below 3. That is more than three times the national takeaway average. Our newer Dixy Chicken benchmark shows the gap has widened further, with 36.1% of analysed sites now rated 3 or below. For the contrast, our Chicken Cottage FHRS analysis shows a competing fried chicken chain where 68.7% of sites are rated 5 and no branch holds a 0 or 1: a materially cleaner lower tail.

Subway is interesting. It is the second-largest takeaway chain in the UK with 1,511 locations. But only 85% are rated 5, putting it behind most major competitors. With a franchise model and variable store sizes, consistency is harder to maintain. You can see the full breakdown on the Subway chain page.

The pattern is clear: chains with strong central compliance systems (Domino's, McDonald's, Greggs) outperform those with looser franchise oversight.

What a rating of 0 actually means for a takeaway

A rating of 0 means 'urgent improvement necessary.' It is the lowest possible score. The FSA gives it when an inspector finds serious food safety failures that pose an immediate risk to public health.

There are currently 180 takeaways in our database rated 0. Another 1,271 are rated 1, meaning 'major improvement necessary.' Together, that is 1,451 takeaways where inspectors found problems serious enough to warrant the two lowest ratings.

A rating of 0 does not automatically close a business. In England and Northern Ireland, displaying your rating is voluntary. A takeaway rated 0 can legally continue operating and choose not to display its score. In Wales, display is mandatory.

The three inspection criteria are food hygiene practices (how food is handled, prepared, and stored), structural compliance (the physical condition of the premises), and confidence in management (whether the business has adequate food safety procedures and records). A takeaway scoring poorly on all three gets a 0.

If you want to check a specific takeaway before ordering, every business in our database has a page showing its current rating, inspection date, and how it compares to the local area average.

The independent takeaway problem

The chain data tells only part of the story. Most UK takeaways are independent. They do not have head office compliance teams or standardised SOPs. And the data shows this matters.

Across the 10 largest takeaway chains, the average percentage rated 5 is 92%. For independent takeaways, that figure drops significantly. The 1,451 takeaways rated 0 or 1 are overwhelmingly independent operators.

This is not about ability. Most independent takeaway owners know their food safety basics. The gap is usually in documentation. EHO inspectors assess confidence in management, which includes whether you have a written food safety management system, temperature logs, and cleaning schedules. A busy owner-operator running a kebab shop until midnight often prioritises cooking over paperwork.

The fix is not complicated. The FSA's Safer Food Better Business (SFBB) pack is free and designed specifically for small takeaways. Digital food safety tools can automate temperature logging for under £30 per month. A food safety management system does not need to be expensive to be effective.

Our data suggests that the takeaways most at risk of a low rating are small, independent, single-site operations in high-density urban areas. If that describes your business, the evidence says investing in documented food safety systems pays off at inspection time.

How we compiled this data

This analysis uses Flux's FHRS database of 603,266 UK food establishments, sourced from the Food Standards Agency's public API and updated weekly. The data snapshot used for this article was taken on 31 March 2026.

We filtered for businesses classified as 'Takeaway/sandwich shop' under the FSA's business type taxonomy. This includes fish and chip shops, pizza takeaways, sandwich bars, kebab shops, Chinese takeaways, Indian takeaways, burger vans, and similar establishments.

Chain rankings are based on our chain matching algorithm, which groups establishments by normalised business name. Locations with 50+ matched outlets are classified as national chains. Smaller chains and independent businesses are counted separately.

Local authority comparisons use the local_authority_name field from the FHRS data. Percentages are calculated against the total number of rated takeaways in each authority area, excluding those awaiting inspection or operating under the Scottish FHIS scheme.

You can explore the full dataset on our rankings page, chain directory, and area guide.

Common mistakes

  • Assuming a chain takeaway is always safe. Most chains score well, but 15% of Dixy Chicken outlets are rated below 3. Always check the specific location.
  • Not checking your takeaway's rating before ordering. Every UK food business has a public hygiene rating. Look it up before you order.
  • Thinking a rating of 3 means 'fine.' A 3 means 'generally satisfactory,' which is the minimum acceptable standard. Two out of three inspection criteria may have issues.
  • Assuming online delivery platforms verify hygiene ratings. Most do not. Deliveroo, Uber Eats, and Just Eat list restaurants regardless of their FHRS score.
  • Ignoring the inspection date. A rating of 5 from three years ago may not reflect current standards. Recent inspections carry more weight.
Check any takeaway before you order.
Flux tracks food hygiene ratings for 602,795 UK food businesses. Search by name, postcode, or chain to see ratings, inspection history, and how any takeaway compares to its local area. Free to use, updated weekly.

FAQ

What percentage of UK takeaways are rated 5?

50.5% of UK takeaways hold a food hygiene rating of 5 (very good), based on our analysis of 62,979 establishments. This is below the national average of 62.3% across all food businesses. Another 16.6% are rated 4 (good), meaning 67.1% of takeaways with a rating score 4 or above.

How many UK takeaways have a food hygiene rating of 0?

180 UK takeaways currently hold a rating of 0 (urgent improvement necessary). Another 1,271 are rated 1 (major improvement necessary). Together, 1,451 takeaways, or 2.3% of all rated takeaways, hold the two lowest possible scores.

Which UK takeaway chain has the best food hygiene ratings?

Domino's Pizza has the best ratings among major UK takeaway chains. 99% of its 1,118 locations are rated 5, with an average rating of 5.0. Nando's (99% rated 5) and Wagamama (99% rated 5) also score at the top, though with fewer locations.

Which UK takeaway chain has the worst food hygiene ratings?

Among chains with 50+ UK locations, Dixy Chicken has the lowest average food hygiene rating at 3.9. Only 49.5% of its 91 outlets are rated 5, and 15.4% are rated below 3. This is significantly worse than the national takeaway average.

Do food delivery apps check hygiene ratings?

Most food delivery platforms do not filter restaurants by hygiene rating. Deliveroo, Uber Eats, and Just Eat list businesses regardless of their FHRS score. Some platforms display the rating on the listing page, but they do not prevent orders from low-rated establishments. Always check the rating yourself before ordering.

Are takeaways required to display their food hygiene rating?

In Wales, yes. Display is mandatory under the Food Hygiene Rating (Wales) Act 2013. In England and Northern Ireland, display is voluntary. A takeaway rated 0 in England can legally operate without showing its rating. The FSA has recommended mandatory display in England, but legislation has not been passed.

Keep exploring

Recommended tools

Sources